C-MAF: Financing circular materials differently

Alternative financing models for circular building materials

JUUNOO creates partition walls that can be endlessly installed and reinstalled: a beautiful circular product. Yet, in large construction projects, too few circular solutions are still being chosen. Such products are newer and often more expensive to purchase, while tenders tend to focus on the initial investment (not on residual value) and the ease of copying existing methods.

To make circular building materials more competitive in large public and private projects, we looked for alternative financing models to the traditional sales model. In doing so, we hope to lower the investment threshold for the construction sector.

Specifically, in this project we financially and legally analyzed buy-back, leasing, and rental as potential alternative financing models. We further developed the buy-back-with-discount model and the leasing model with a numerical example. We held discussions with contractors, manufacturers, architects, and other materials producers to gather insights from all perspectives. Both models appear to offer many advantages (but also raise concerns).

To make the choice of financing model more transparent, we also designed a Circular Value Index (CVI).

The legal foundation was elaborated in an academic publication that links this new way of thinking to various legal domains.

JUUNOO

Partners Tack 51, SURA Impact

MOST IMPORTANT
RESULTS

  1. We compared different business models using the layered model. We conducted a financial and legal analysis of buy-back with circular discount, rental, and leasing, and validated the models with stakeholders.
  2. We designed a circularity clause for anyone wishing to work with the circular discount model, as well as a sample leasing contract tailored to circular use.
  3. We developed a Circular Value Index (CVI) based on the ratio between residual value and reuse cost of a material, which calculates its circular value. It indicates whether something is circular enough to be marketed through a buy-back model or leasing.
  4. We laid the foundation for the first Flemish MASCO (Material Service Company): an investment fund that takes on the pre-financing and revalorization of circular materials.

MOST IMPORTANT
LESSONS LEARNED

  1. The choice of financing model (buy-back, rental, or leasing) largely depends on the building layer, i.e., the lifespan and the extent to which something is ‘fixed’ to the building.
  2. The linear model is still deeply embedded in the construction sector, and everything revolves around price. For many stakeholders, buy-back is seen as too high a risk. More examples are needed to show that circular solutions are both practical and beneficial.
  3. Thanks to the CVI, it is indeed possible to objectively assess a building material for value creation, and therefore its suitability for an alternative financing model.
  4. There is a need for an intermediary, such as a MASCO, to make the model scalable and financially viable. Ideally, the MASCO would act as a hub for various materials that meet strict circular criteria.
20 directly involved stakeholders
1.000 reached construction actors
3 democases
1 academic publication

WHAT DOES
THE FUTURE HOLD?

The CVI proves to be a basic formula that can offer producers, builders, and investors insight and guidance regarding the (future) circular value. Various construction actors have shown strong interest in using it to explore alternative financing models.

In addition, we aim to work on the establishment of a MASCO as an intermediary that can both provide pre-financing and handle buy-back and reuse. The concepts of CVI and MASCO were also recently selected by the Circular Building Coalition as a blueprint project, which will lead to further development and international scaling.

Finally, the published paper can serve as a legal and academic foundation for various courses and the further expansion of legal circular knowledge.